Parents held responsible for childrens crime Essay

Parents hold a lot of tariff when raising children. They are there to teach them right from wrong and how to behave in order to raise them into successful men and women that todays society can relate to rather than juvenile delinquents that this field discriminates upon. It is the parents responsibility to instill values into their young children because as the children grow it becomes their responsibility to make their own decisions since one day they will have to face the real world on their own.So I believe parents should not be held accountable for their childrens actions because blaming parents is not loss to help children learn from their mistakes. Advocates who subscribe to full parental accountability stated, They believe parents should know about and control their childrens actions and accept their obligation to bear the consequences of their childrens mistakes. By this comment theyre stating that parents basically merit each punishment their children commit. However, parents shouldnt be incarcerated for their childrens wrong doings, the child themselves are responsible for the umbrages they committed. They deserve to pay the price for the actions they take.If children did the crime then the most(prenominal) reasonable explanation would be that they pay the price. Blaming parents isnt going to help the children learn from their mistakes, its just going to make it that much easier for them to commit the crime again without getting any punishment sent their way. When it comes to parents some may be the best when it comes to raising their children, however their child decide to go downwardly a different path with the wrong crowd and completely misbehave.That doesnt mean that the parents should be punished for the childs mistakes. Parents instill rules upon their children and have spicy expectations for them. However, many children in todays society are easily influenced by people in their surroundings. So, by attacking the parents the problem is nt going to change and the situation isnt going to get any easier. The vicious dog analogy that states, Parents should control a child just as an owner should control a dog is not a reasonable statement. I fully agree with the author Sylvia Miller. Children are not animals nor should they be treated manage animals.They dont deserve to be controlled like a pet. By controlling a child and keeping them enclosed like a pet, is except going to make matters worse and the child is going to rebel. A parent has to lay down supervision and care for their children, but arent responsible for everyaction the child makes. If we continue to blame parents for their childrens crimes, then we will see no positive outcomes in the childs future. Parents cant control their children only influence them.If a parent continues to try to participate in a childs life and that child continues to rebel. It is therefore not the parents fault of the crime that child commits. It is up to the children to follow the rules that their parents established for them in order to live a successful life.