Einstein :: essays research papers

Albert Einstein, an acclaimed researcher. Everybody realizes that. Yet, what amount do you truly think about him. All things considered, this article is to      Albert Einstein was conceived on March 15, 1879, in the town of Ulm, in Southern Germany. That town was situated at the foot of the Swabian Alps. His location was 135 Bahnhofstrasse yet that house was later decimated in a World War II besieging run. His folks were Hermann and Pauline Koch Einstein. Them two were Jewish, yet didn’t firmly practice the religion. In this way, â€Å"Israelitic† was composed on the Religion area of Einstein’s birth testament. Two years after Einstein’s birth, Einstein’s sister, Maria, was conceived. Einstein could talk in entire sentences at three years old. Einstein’s mother, Pauline Einstein, adored music so Einstein took Violin exercises from age six to thirteen. Einstein’s father wasn’t an effective businessperson. He at that point began a pipes/electrical building organization with his sibling in Munich, trusting that would be a triumph. Albert went through the following 14 years of his life there. Albert should go to a Jewish school, however his folks believed that he would improve training at a Catholic School. He despised the school’s military convention and environment. Einstein wasn’t clever during this time. At twelve years old, he went to a recreation center, Luitpold Gymnasium to be increasingly accurate, which resembles a center school and a secondary school joined. During at that point, he was beginning to peruse books on science. He met a poor researcher who helped Einstein in his examinations. The scholar’s name was Max Talmud. To support Einstein’s information, he gave Einstein a few difficult issues. One of them was to demonstrate the Pythagorean hypothesis. (See Diagram 1.) In 1894, Einstein’s family moved to Milan, Italy, however Einstein needed to remain in Munich to complete his examinations. Prior to the furthest limit of the school year, which was a half year after his folks left, he was advised to leave the recreation center due to his lack of respect to his instructors. He at that point moved to Italy, which was an astonishment to his folks since they weren’t anticipating him in Italy. At the point when he was 16â ½, he stepped through an examination to get into the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH). You didn’t need a secondary school certificate to get into the ETH. Rather, you have to breeze through an extremely hard assessment. The ETH likewise assumed another significant job in Einstein’s life: it conceded ladies. Einstein :: articles research papers Albert Einstein, an acclaimed researcher. Everybody realizes that. Be that as it may, what amount do you truly think about him. All things considered, this article is to      Albert Einstein was conceived on March 15, 1879, in the town of Ulm, in Southern Germany. That town was situated at the foot of the Swabian Alps. His location was 135 Bahnhofstrasse however that house was later demolished in a World War II besieging run. His folks were Hermann and Pauline Koch Einstein. Them two were Jewish, however didn’t unequivocally practice the religion. Along these lines, â€Å"Israelitic† was composed on the Religion area of Einstein’s birth declaration. Two years after Einstein’s birth, Einstein’s sister, Maria, was conceived. Einstein could talk in entire sentences at three years old. Einstein’s mother, Pauline Einstein, cherished music so Einstein took Violin exercises from age six to thirteen. Einstein’s father wasn’t a fruitful agent. He at that point began a pipes/electrical designing organization with his sibling in Munich, trusting that would be a triumph. Albert went through the fo llowing 14 years of his life there. Albert should go to a Jewish school, however his folks felt that he would show signs of improvement training at a Catholic School. He despised the school’s military custom and climate. Einstein wasn’t astute during this time. At twelve years old, he went to a recreation center, Luitpold Gymnasium to be increasingly definite, which resembles a center school and a secondary school joined. During at that point, he was beginning to peruse books on science. He met a poor researcher who helped Einstein in his examinations. The scholar’s name was Max Talmud. To help Einstein’s information, he gave Einstein a few difficult issues. One of them was to demonstrate the Pythagorean hypothesis. (See Diagram 1.) In 1894, Einstein’s family moved to Milan, Italy, however Einstein needed to remain in Munich to complete his investigations. Prior to the furthest limit of the school year, which was a half year after his folks left, he was advised to leave the exercise room as a result of his lack of regard to his educators. He at that point moved to Italy, which was an amazement to his folks since they weren’t anticipating him in Italy. At the point when he was 16â ½, he stepped through an examination to get into the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH). You didn’t need a secondary school confirmation to get into the ETH. Rather, you have to breeze through an extremely hard assessment. The ETH likewise assumed another significant job in Einstein’s life: it conceded ladies.

Change management: the implications of self-interest on organizational change

Presentation Associations in the advanced business condition face fast change driven by globalization and nonstop mechanical development. To adjust to this quick change and to be fruitful in improving hierarchical execution in this condition, a powerful methodology is required to encourage the progressing of people, groups and associations to an ideal future state. An organized methodology empowering hierarchical change would guarantee smooth change and effective usage in the quest for enduring advantages (Bennis, 2000). In spite of this need, endeavors towards authoritative change frequently run into some type of human obstruction due basically to the assorted manners by which people and gatherings act because of progress. Anyway sane or positive, change regularly causes some type of passionate strife and includes impression of misfortune and vulnerability (Beitler, 2005). Kotter and Schlesinger (1979; 451) recognize four basic reasons individuals oppose change including: †¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"a want no t to lose something of significant worth (parochial personal circumstance), a misconception of the change and its suggestions, a conviction that the change doesn't bode well for the association, and a low resilience for change.† Self-intrigue is a significant purpose behind opposition inside associations with individuals concentrating on their own wellbeing and not those of the whole association. This paper investigates the impact of personal circumstance in change the board assessing the view that this factor requires the selection of pluralism in associations as to the executives styles and approaches, authoritative plan, culture, and dynamic. Additionally assessed is simply the view that despite the fact that intrigue subverts the idea of â€Å"shared authoritative vision,† it is fundamental to the cognizance of the idea of protection from change and how that obstruction may be overseen. This is accomplished through a top to bottom investigation assessing authoritati ve setting, culture just as representative conduct and mentalities which are connected to potential opposition. It adds to the comprehension and utilization of progress the board procedures and how transformational change can be supported towards improved authoritative execution. Parochial personal circumstance Regardless of potential positive results, it is about consistently the case that change is stood up to. A level of obstruction is typical and worthy given that change and its chaperon procedure is regularly problematic and unpleasant (Lawson and Price, 2003). A level of suspicion can likewise be sound particularly when there are genuine or seen shortcomings in the change proposed, which should be tended to for the change to have wanted positive results (Frese and Fay, 2001). In any case, obstruction in any structure and from whatever cause hinders the accomplishment of business destinations which structure the quintessence of the interest and viable administration of authoritative change (Bennis, 2000). It is a generally held supposition that people are brought into the world with personal circumstance as an inborn propensity and their essential thought process, which underlies their ostensibly obvious conduct, is to defend and to improve these interests (Miller, 1999). This inclinat ion is regularly programmed, routine and is as a rule practiced without cognizant idea (Mansbridge, 1990; Miller, 1999). Personal responsibility is, consequently, some portion of ordinary human instinct inalienable in our being with each individual having the penchant to barely concentrate on their own wellbeing and self-protection before that of others including the association. Personal responsibility concerns singular respect for the ramifications of progress for themselves connected to a longing not to lose something of significant worth. With regards to authoritative change, this worry and respect for self regularly makes people oppose changes or adjustments, especially if there are doubts or antagonistic observations in regards to the progressions or conditions (van Dam et al, 2008). Solid protection from change is anyway regularly established in sentiments that are verifiably fortified and profoundly adapted, set up ways, strategies, or techniques which could be dependent upo n disturbance through the change (Battilana and Casciaro, 2013). Obstruction could likewise result from the individual’s view of a specific circumstance, just as their degrees of resilience for change which could be connected to different reasons for opposition, for example, lacking data or potentially comprehension of the need and ramifications of the change; satisfactory aptitudes advancement and preparing; trust and a suspicion that all is well and good; and in general representative relations in association settings (Zander, 1950; Beitler, 2005). In any case, sometimes, personal responsibility has antagonistic meanings of avarice and self-centeredness in the setting wherein such self-concern conflicts with the interests of others or generally acknowledged virtues (Miller, 1999; Rocha and Ghoshal, 2006). For this situation, an individual demonstrations to shield singular advantages and additionally to upgrade gain regardless of the effect and impact of their choices and ac tivities on others including the interests and destinations of the association. In the investigation of the idea of personal responsibility and its suggestions with regards to authoritative change, this paper audits two hypothetical perspectives appropriate to this core interest. These incorporate the normal financial view which is examined close by integral hypotheses, for example, the bureaucratic-pecking order hierarchical hypothesis and the neo-institutional monetary hypothesis; and the humanistic view, where the communitarian and cooperation speculations are tended to. These directions mirror a move in respect for human instinct and conduct from the conventional thin meaning of the sound, egocentric individual to a more noteworthy acknowledgment of limit with regards to other-direction and readiness of people for cooperative activity. Hypothetical setting In neoclassical financial aspects under the industrialist framework, the business condition is depicted in a robotic nature with organizations depicted as ‘machines’ serving basically revenue driven boost subject to press laws of rivalry (Mahoney, 2005). This phonetic plan will in general disregard reality and spotlights carefully on numerical language which in a perfect world, though not truly, replaces human judgment with calculations (Rubinstein, 2006). It doesn't foresee difficulties with respect to the human segment of associations, accepting it to be among basic components of creation. In any case, the human segment in business is critical and can't be overlooked or dispensed with in the direct of financial exercises; being a basic space through which singular members practice duty (Sen, 2002; Harder et al, 2004). Organizations in the cutting edge world need to ponder the human asset segment, given the quickly changing nature of business and more noteworthy adaptab ility and opportunities of representatives taking part underway. A focal worry in the investigation of authoritative conduct is the means by which to get representatives to contribute significant levels of exertion and execution to their organization’s aggregate premiums (Mahoney and McGahan. 2007). It involves the quest for systems through which to accomplish more prominent arrangement between oneself and the aggregate intrigue (Lawson and Price, 2003; van Dam et al, 2008) basic for the accomplishment of upgraded authoritative execution and significant in the cutting edge dynamic business condition especially in snapshots of progress. On one hand, with regards to neoclassical financial aspects, the training and investigation of associations has been founded on the chief suspicion of people and associations as sane entertainers seeking after their personal circumstances in an intrinsically serious space in which a few gatherings included make progress toward rare assets (Dief enbach, 2007). This is the reason for the normal financial view which accept that self and aggregate interests are basically in strife (Zander, 1950). Interestingly, the humanistic perspective holds that the two interests are not free of one another, grasping the view that they are good (Dierksmeier, 2009). These perspectives are investigated in more prominent detail. Levelheaded monetary view This view basically expect that people are autonomous operators sanely seeking after activities that look to amplify their own personal matters as an essential inspiration for their commitment in monetary contemplations (Mahoney and McGahan. 2007). This has its premise in depictions in a lot of Theory X suspicions with respect to human instinct portrayed by McGregor (1960) which are started on the view that representatives are normally languid and harbor an abhorrence for work. People are consequently hesitant to add to the destinations of the associations, seeking after just cash and security. The goal of associations, at that point, is to control singular conduct through discerning and proficient authoritative structures and procedures which guarantee consistency with hierarchical objectives and targets, for example, solidness, effectiveness and profitability (Sen, 2002; Dierksmeier, 2009). In this view, authoritative plan, regulatory structure and the board approaches hold fast to bureaucratic-progressive structure. The structure of assignments follows standards of division of work and effectiveness expansion pegged on traditional financial matters (Diefenbach, 2007). Control is accomplished through frameworks of expert in the structure, composed principles and guidelines, discipline and intimidation for degenerates, just as motivating forces, for example, professional success and remuneration for consistence (Mahoney, 2005). Late development of neo-institutional or hierarchical financial aspects applying objective monetary suppositions to the examination of associations has picked up in prevalence. This methodology loosens up the restricted presumptions of objective financial matters and withdraws from the shortsighted and negative perspective on the idea of people (Sen, 2002; Mahoney and McGahan, 2007). The fundamental supposition that people are sound in aim, personal responsibility a

Blog Archive Mission Admission Leverage Scholarships

Blog Archive Mission Admission Leverage Scholarships Mission Admission is a series of MBA admission tips; a new one is posted each Tuesday. Oh the difference a day makes. One day, you are on the outside, wondering whether you will ever get into any of your target schools. Then, the next day, you get a call from the MBA admissions board at your first-choice school, and your life changes forever. Suddenly, with an acceptance letter in hand, you become more self-assured and start to contemplate whether you will receive scholarships. Then, your second-choice school calls and offers you $10K. You now find yourself facing a tough choice: accepting the offer from the second-choice school that comes with a scholarship or the offer from the first-choice program, even though it does not come with any funds? In the short term, you do not need to make this choice. With acceptance letters in hand, you can diplomatically leverage the financial aid offer you received from your second-choice school to influence the decision at your first. Once you have been accepted, your first choice just might not be prepared to let you go. Of course, diplomacy is key. If you make your request in too forceful a manner, you will only alienate the financial aid office, which may then decide to not offer additional resources to encourage you to choose the other school. So tread carefully, but you will not lose anything by asking for more. Share ThisTweet Mission Admission

When I first enrolled in Technology and Society, I...

When I first enrolled in Technology and Society, I honestly did not know what to think of this class. I thought I was going to feel awkward because maybe it was going be a class full of nerds, which there wasn’t, and all we would talk about was different kinds of inventions and how they effected society. After completing the course it was pretty much true, the class discussed many inventions and how they have effected society throughout the years, even how society has effected technology. One of the main topics that was covered in the class was how many different definitions there was of what was considered technology. The biggest lesson that was taught was how technology and society have been linked so closely throughout history, and now†¦show more content†¦Everyone has seen that kid with music blasting out of his headphones, or the girl rapidly texting on her phone. The youth of today are constantly drawn in technological advancements that promote nonstop communica tion and instant satisfaction, whether through cell phones, video games, laptops, or iPod/MP3 players. Before the invention of these devices, family members would sit together around the table and play games together. However, since the invention of video games, those kinds of entertainment have changed to games played individually, and the impact of such games on family relations is apparent. Nowadays instead of watching TV together or eating a family meal, everyone in the family is in a separate room, either playing video games, watching football, on their computers or on their phones. Though, in some cases, technology helps parents to communicate with their children and know their location, it is not always enough for children’s safety just to stay connected with the family. People are so fascinated by their smart phones or laptops that they are blind to others around them. Consequently, spending less time with family and more time with different gadgets can cause the loss of tight contacts with close relations. But are these technological advancements a good thing? I believe that the growth of technology has negatively influenced the social interactions of todays youth because it isolates people from reality, gets in the way ofShow MoreRelatedHow Technology Has Changed Our Future?2020 Words   |  9 PagesRegression We live in the 21st century where mostly everything is done by technology. In 1965, Gordon Moore predicted that technology would rapidly improve every 18 months. Fast forward to 2016 and we have improved so well technologically that it has become something nobody could have ever predicted. We are living in a golden age of technology with discoveries happen every day. In 2016, we tend to make fun of the technology from five years ago because we can never imagine how we could have possiblyRead MoreWeb Learning : What Motivates Online Learning2705 Words   |  11 Pages Online Learning: What Motivates Online Learning Stephanie McAllum University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee Online Learning: What Motivates Online Learning Introduction Distance learning can be traced back at least two centuries, although there has been a momentous change in the way the education has been transmitted to the learner. The earliest form of distance learning noted was through the postal service, which has today evolved to an assortment of instruments accessible via theRead MorePerceptions of Youth Towards Premarital Sex9892 Words   |  40 Pagesissue confronting high school students. This isn’t to say that sexual temptations only existed in youth. But these days, being youth, they are more cut off from familial restrictions and parish supports, confronted with peer pressure that alleges â€Å"everyone is doing it,† and perhaps exposed to an irreligious environment. Whether to engage in premarital sex is a question of critical importance. For better or worse, the effects of this decision (often made when powerful emotions are at work) last a lifetimeRead MoreHow Addiction Effects the Psychological and Physical Function ing of Daily Life7330 Words   |  30 Pages I. Introduction This qualitative research will investigate how addiction effects the psychological and physical functioning of daily life. Psychological functioning is the cognitive and behavioral characteristics of an individual and how they work. This research relates to counseling. The field of counseling looks at methods that will engage an individual with personal issues and how they cope on daily basis. I have several reasons why this topic is of interest to me. I am a CertifiedRead MoreInterview Questions and Answers16418 Words   |  66 Pagesabout yourself. This is really more of a request than a question. But these few words can put you on the spot in a way no question can. Many quickly lose control of the interview during the most critical time- the first five minutes. This is not the time to go into a lengthy history or wander off in different directions. Your response should be focused and purposeful. Communicate a pattern of interests and skills that relate to the position in question. Consider your response to this question as aRead MoreModernization of Ntuc Income Case Study14065 Words   |  57 PagesLearning Objectives AFTER READING THIS CHAPTER , YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO : I Deï ¬ ne emotions and identify the two dimensions around which emotions are organized. I Diagram the model of emotions, attitudes, and behaviour. I Identify the conditions that require and problems with emotional labour. I Outline the four components of emotional intelligence. I Summarize the effects of job dissatisfaction in terms of the exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. I Compare the effects of affective andRead MoreModernization of Ntuc Income Case Study14054 Words   |  57 PagesAttitudes Learning Objectives AFTER READING THIS CHAPTER , YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO : I Deï ¬ ne emotions and identify the two dimensions around which emotions are organized. I Diagram the model of emotions, attitudes, and behaviour. I Identify the conditions that require and problems with emotional labour. I Outline the four components of emotional intelligence. I Summarize the effects of job dissatisfaction in terms of the exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. I Compare the effects of affective and continuanceRead More111135197X 38570 Essay example17696 Words   |  71 PagesPre-test: What Do You Already Know? See page 350 of Writing Clearly, Third Edition for answers to the Pre-test. Practice What You Have Learned (pages 21–25) Exercise 1 (page 21) I 1. I have been interested in physics since high school. I 2. Having good social skills is essential for my job, and I decided (OR have decided) to take a class in personal communication. I 3. Since she was a child, she has liked sports, especially water sports, such as swimming and waterskiing. I 4. MarioRead MoreSAT Top 30 Essay Evidence18536 Words   |  75 Pagesbrilliant author and war reporter) ............................................................ 13 Frank Lloyd Wright (America’s legendary architect) .............................................................................. 15 Napoleon Hill and Think and Grow Rich (The Original Self-Help Book) ............................................... 17 Vincent van Gogh (A master painter struck by madness) ........................................................................ 19 Athletes and Sports Stars: Read MoreCollege Student Gambling: Examining the Effects of Gaming Education Within a College Curriculum15937 Words   |  64 PagesJeffrey A. Fernsten, Member _____________________________ Rodney Warnick, Department Head Department of Hospitality Tourism Management ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I offer my sincere appreciation and gratitude to my Chair, Dr. Chris Roberts. His inspiration for this study, solid guidance throughout the process, patience, and motivation were invaluable. I also am indebted to committee members Dr. Linda Shea, who has consistently provided me with positive encouragement, support and sound advice, and to Dr. Jeffrey

Xenophobia in the United States

Effects Of Caffeine On The United States Of America

Coffee is a very popular, and commonplace, drink in the United States of America. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, adolescents should not consume more than one hundred milligrams a day, and even less so for younger children. Typically, an eight ounce (237 milliliters) drink of brewed caffeinated coffee contains a range of ninety-five to two hundred milligrams of coffee, whereas the same sized drink of decaffeinated coffee will generally have two to twelve milligrams (Nutrition). So, decaffeinated coffee only contains, generally, 0.04% of the caffeine that untreated coffee grounds have. In testing both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee, it might be possible to see if the caffeine in the coffee will have a distinct effect†¦show more content†¦Fast plants were first routinely planted in Nepal by a farmer. Generations later, a plant explorer recognized them as brassica plants. She took seeds back to the United States and they were left untouched until a scientist was looking for a brassica plant in order to further study diseases that plagu ed plants of the same family, such as cabbage or broccoli. This scientist decided to use these Fast Plants because they had a much shorter life cycle than the other plant he was considering using (Williams). Instead of a year per each generation, fast plant’s life cycle is only thirty-five days long, as is seen from the image to the left. The plants usually are flowering in twelve to fourteen days (Wisconsin 1). A typical life cycle of fast plants is faster than other plants, contributing to its name â€Å"Fast Plants†. Typically, the cotyledon will appear within forty-eight to seventy-two hours, true leaves should form in four to nine days, and flowers will open in thirteen to seventeen days. By using Fast Plants, data is able to be collected quicker than if a traditional plant was to be used. However, in order to optimize growing time, certain conditions need to be met. Such conditions for these plants are things such as temperature and distance from a grow light. According to the pamphlet that comes with Wisconsin Fast Plants, the optimum temperature for the plants is twenty-two to twenty-eight degrees centigrade. There

Ethical Issues in the Field Of Medicine-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss the legal and ethical issues faced in the medical field in regard to the given case. Answer: Introduction Every profession has certain legal and ethical standards, which, at times can tend to collide with each other. For example, in medicine, the legal standards often contradict the ethical norms and create dilemmas, making it very difficult to solve by choosing the right option. Ethical values followed by the medical practitioners are the standard rules of Bioethics, as set by the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) (Plomer, 2013). This essay will discuss the legal and ethical issues faced in the medical field in regard to the given case, focussing on the principles of each that often contradict one another. Legal issues: The elements of a valid informed consent must be present in the given scenario for the paramedics to conduct the treatment of Richards heat shock (Lamont, Jeon, Chiarella, 2013). Firstly, Richard must be let known about the pros and cons of treatment by the paramedics. Secondly, he must be made aware of the consequences of both having and not having the treatment done on him. Lastly, he must be made aware of the necessity of such treatment, by the paramedics.The law on bioethics (UDBHR) for medicine states clearly that the elements of informed consent must be present before the treatment of any patient. In addition, the law states that in case of treatment without consent of the patient, the medical practitioners will be held legally liable (Wells Kaptchuk, 2012). The paramedics have the right to treat Richard for his head injury, even though he had refused their treatment for heat shock, previously. It is so, because according to the exceptions to the principle of informed consent, a medical practitioner need not obtain the consent of a patient for treatment in case of emergency when the patient is unable to consent. Therefore, in this given case, even though the medical crew did not obtain Richards informed consent for the heat shock treatment, they can provide treatment for his head injury, as after his head was injured, Richard was unable to give consent and it was an urgent and emergency situation (Flynn et al., 2012). The law of bioethics(UDBHR)states that during a treatment, if another problem crops up which isresolved by doing the initial treatment, the medical practitioner need not require the consent of the patient(Kaye et al., 2015). Therefore, in this case, Richard was incapable of providingconsent because ofhis head injury andcranio-facial surgery was necessary(Garrino et al., 2015), therefore, the medical practitioners did not need consent for Richards cranio-facial surgery. This is clearly stated under the law of bioethics and is also an exception to the principle of informed consent. Richard is a resident of Queensland, Australia, where his wife Meryl and children live. At the time of the head injury, Richards wife was not present, and Lucas took charge of Richard. He had called the paramedics after Richard suffered the head injury and at the same time informed Richards wife, Meryl. The paramedics decided toadmit Richard to a major hospital in Brisbane, which meant he was flown by air ambulance. Richards wife, after being informed by Lucas about Richards injury, straightaway went to the hospital.Lucas drove down to the hospital and by the time he reached to the hospital Meryl was already there. In the circumstances, treatment decisions related to Richard depends on Meryl, as she has a legal relationship with Richard and has the right to make decisions for him. Lucas, who initially took responsibility for Richard, has no legal relationship with Richard and cannot make decisions regarding his health treatment (Bickenbach, 2012). Hence, Richards wife will be the one to take decisions regarding Richards treatment based on their legal relationship (Stewart, 2012). In case of any disagreement regarding any decision for Richards treatment, between Meryl and the medical practitioners, the only option that will be left is to obtain the decisions of the Queensland Civil Administrative Tribunal (QCAT), which decides these kinds of cases, brought before it by any medical practitioner regarding the treatment of patients requiring special medical care. If the medical practitioners believe that Meryls decisions regarding Richards treatment are not the best course of action medically they will approach QCAT. In no condition, the decisions of Lucas will not prevail due to the presence of Meryl, as Lucas, being a friend of Richard, shares no legal relationship with Richard. Therefore, the issue is the difference between what Meryl wants and what is regarded as medically the best course of action. In such cases, QCAT investigates the medical condition of the patient and after its investigation, gives a verdict based on the medical issue. QCAT is the only legal authority in Queensland that has the authority to decide the future treatment of Richard in this case, if the medical practitioners dont agree with Meryls wishes regarding the same (Ries, Thompson Lowe, 2017). In order to withdraw the life sustaining measures Richard is surviving on, certain factors are required to beconsidered, including the current health condition of the patient and whether there is any chance of recovery if life sustaining measures are discontinued and whether there is any other feasible option available that can cure the patient (Alberthsen et al., 2013). The decisionof QCAT must be obeyed if the case has been referred to it, as once a case is referred to QCAT, the decision becomes legally binding. Ethical issues Two principles, which can be identified in this case, are those of autonomy and beneficence. The principle of autonomy deals with informed consent. According to theprinciple of autonomy under theUDBHR, a patient, or their legal representative,must be provided with information, by the medical practitioners, about the pros and cons of a particular treatment before the treatment is actually done. Disclosure must be madeabout the necessities of such treatment and the circumstances of avoiding it. However, the most important aspect of this principle is that the patient must give consent to go through a particular treatment, provided, they are competent to do so (Padulo et al., 2013). This principle also states that such a decision of the patient must be made without coercion or fraud. If the patient refuses to go through the treatment, then such treatment must not happen.No medical staff can refuse treatment if the patient wants it(Herring, 2014). The principle of beneficence states that the medical practitioners are required to perform, keeping in mind the benefits to the patient, with all the knowledge and skill they possess (Page, 2012). Taking into consideration the facts of this scenario, the two abovementioned principles apply. In the given case, the principle of autonomy, which states the rule of the self, that is free from controlling interferences by others and free from personal limitations that prevent meaningful choice of a person. An autonomous individual acts intentionally, without controlling influences and with understanding. It also includes the principle of informed consent,that applies in the given case because during Richards heat shock the paramedics could not conduct his treatment as Richard refused it. Later, the same paramedics took charge of Richards treatment and legally admitted him to the hospital without his consent. It is so because the principle of informed consent states that during an emergency situation, when a person is not able to consent and the situation requires immediate treatment, it is not required to obtain informed consent in such situations. Both these incidents attract the principles of informed consent under the principle of autonomy (Hess et al., 2015). On the other hand, the principle of beneficence applies in the given case as there was a clash between the opinions of Meryl and Lucas,and the medical practitioners regarding Richards treatment. It is the principle of beneficence under which the differences in opinion will get resolved and the medical practitioners will be able to act in accordance with the best treatment process for Richard ( Fisher, 2016). The stakeholders in the given scenario are Meryl, Lucas and the medical practitioners. The ethical values of all three differ.Lucas, on the one hand, does not want his friend, Richard,to go through unnecessary pain and suffering, as he had once asked Lucas to turn life-support machines off if he ever suffered from any incurable disease or disability. The life-support machines keeping Richard alive were not improving Richards health. Therefore, Lucas wanted Richard to be relieved of this unnecessary pain and suffering and have the life support-machines turned off, so that Richard could die peacefully. The opinion of the medical practitioners is that the life-support machines were not improving Richards health and were causing nothing but unnecessary pain and suffering to Richard.On the other hand, Meryl believes that Richard will get cured someday, as cures have happened in similar cases. In this situation, there will be conflict between the values of Meryl and the medical practitione rs and the principles of autonomy and the principle of beneficence. The principle of autonomy will collide with the values of the medical practitioner because Richards or his representatives consent is required for stopping the life-support measures. Lucass opinion or values wont collide as he has no legal authority, being just a friend of Richard.The principle of beneficence will collide with the values of Meryl because according to the principle, the medical practitionershave an option to take such steps that are beneficial for the patient(Beauchamp, 2016). According to the medical staff, they also believed that further treatment will not be of any use for Richard and as there was a clash of opinion between the medical practitioners and Meryl, they can refer the case to the QCAT and the QCATs decision will prevail in this case. According to Kerridges et al (2013) modified model for solving ethical issues, there is no particular solution to the ethical issues or problems that arise in the medical field. Kerridges modified model for solving ethical issues can be called ethical parameters, which are required to be maintained by all medical practitioners, during any medical or nursing practices. The model suggests that, this void needs to be filled with a conceptual understanding in accordance with the nature of the situationwhich is difficult to deal with and where there are two or more alternatives which are equally undesirable (Degeling, 2015). However, according to this modified model of Kerridge, along with the Australian courts, the focus must be on the patient. One way to solve the conflict between ethical values and other contradicting principles is to put the focus on the want and well-being of the patient. In this case, as there is a conflict between the principles of law and ethical values, focus should be on the patient. Lucas mentioned that Richard had asked him to end his life, if he ever suffers from an incurable medical condition. By saying so, Richard meant that he wanted Lucas not to prolong his life unnecessarily by any medical means, if he suffers from an incurable disease or incurable disability.In this case the choice that is better for the patient must be the area of importance, rather than remaining in a dilemma due to the conflicting values of the medical practitioners and Meryl.Kerridges et al. (2013) modified version states that medical advancement and ethics vary from country to country and hospital to hospital. It is very difficult to find the same clinical ethics everywhere. The type of practitioner and the technologies pertaining to medical science also differ in different places. In complicated medical cases where the values and the medical ethics collide, it can only be solved when the medical practitioners use the help of better medical practitioners and advanced technologies to determine the condition of the patient and to find out the suitable treatment for the patient. As stated earlier, the want of the patient is also to be considered. Therefore, according to the modified solutions for ethical problems in medicine, by Kerridge et al. (2013), as Richards health condition, even after treatment for a long period, was not improving and there is a clash between the values and decisions of the medical practitioners and Meryl regarding Richards treatment, the medical practitioners should first use the most advanced method to determine what is the best option regarding Richa rds health and then give importance to what Richard wants. It is also mentioned in the case that Richard would rather choose death than suffering from such a disease. The medical practitioners believed that the best option is to stop Richards treatment. Hence, the medical practitioners should consult QCAT. Conclusion From the above discussion it is clear that the medical profession is driven by various legal and ethical principles which often collide and create legal and ethical issues. It discusses these principles of ethics and laws, in relation to medicine, in the lights of a given case. It includes the principles of autonomy and beneficence. It states the steps a medical practitioner should follow under different situations and the steps they should take at times of ethical dilemmas. In addition, the above discussion also mentions the powers of QCAT, which is the legal authority in Queensland in relation to such complicated medical cases. Finally, the essay concludes by focusing on the modified model, by Kerridge, for solving ethical problems, especially in the field of medicine. References: Alberthsen, C., Rand, J. S., Bennett, P. C., Paterson, M., Lawrie, M., Morton, J. M. (2013). Cat admissions to RSPCA shelters in Queensland, Australia: description of cats and risk factors for euthanasia after entry.Australian veterinary journal,91(1-2), 35-42. Beauchamp, T. L. (2016). Principlism in Bioethics. InBioethical Decision Making and Argumentation(pp. 1-16). Springer International Publishing. Bickenbach, J. (2012). Argumentation and informed consent in the doctorpatient relationship.Journal of Argumentation in context,1(1), 5-18. Degeling, C., Johnson, J., Kerridge, I., Wilson, A., Ward, M., Stewart, C., Gilbert, G. (2015). Implementing a One Health approach to emerging infectious disease: reflections on the socio-political, ethical and legal dimensions.BMC Public Health,15(1), 1307. Fisher, C. B. (2016).Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Sage Publications. Fletcher, J. F. (2015).Morals and Medicine: the moral problems of the patient's right to know the truth, contraception, artificial insemination, sterilization, euthanasia. Princeton University Press. Flynn, D., Knoedler, M. A., Hess, E. P., Murad, M. H., Erwin, P. J., Montori, V. M., Thomson, R. G. (2012). Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision?making: a systematic review.Academic Emergency Medicine,19(8), 959-967. Garrino, L., Picco, E., Finiguerra, I., Rossi, D., Simone, P., Roccatello, D. (2015). Living with and treating rare diseases: Experiences of patients and professional health care providers.Qualitative health research,25(5), 636-651. Hess, E. P., Grudzen, C. R., Thomson, R., Raja, A. S., Carpenter, C. R. (2015). Shared Decision?making in the Emergency Department: Respecting Patient Autonomy When Seconds Count.Academic Emergency Medicine,22(7), 856-864. Herring, J. (2014).Medical law and ethics. Oxford University Press, USA. Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., Melham, K. (2015). Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.European Journal of Human Genetics,23(2), 141-146. Lamont, S., Jeon, Y. H., Chiarella, M. (2013). Assessing patient capacity to consent to treatment: An integrative review of instruments and tools.Journal of clinical nursing,22(17-18), 2387-2403. Padulo, J., Oliva, F., Frizziero, A., Maffulli, N. (2013). Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field science research.Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal,3(4), 250. Page, K. (2012). The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?.BMC medical ethics,13(1), 10. Plomer, A. (2013).The law and ethics of medical research: international bioethics and human rights. Routledge. Ries, N. M., Thompson, K. A., Lowe, M. (2017). Including people with dementia in research: An analysis of Australian ethical and legal rules and recommendations for reform.Journal of Bioethical Inquiry,14(3), 359-374. Stewart, C. L. (2012). A defence of the requirement to seek consent to withhold and withdraw futile treatments.Medical Journal of Australia,196(6), 406. Wells, R. E., Kaptchuk, T. J. (2012). To tell the truth, the whole truth, may do patients harm: the problem of the nocebo effect for informed consent.The American Journal of Bioethics,12(3), 22-29.